🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to employ a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a district court's block that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its action.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the maps drawn after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

With a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its decision was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Redistricting Battle

The ruling occurs during a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican control. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that might create several more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic leaders criticized the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A leading House figure argued the court had yet again damaged its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.